Thoughts on Super Tuesday Eve
The Real Issue Is Bernie
I’m not
so pleased about Bernie Sanders’ prospects in today’s Super Tuesday primaries.
But the talk is that he’s looking to other states down the road where his
chances are better, and Hillary’s current roll is not necessarily the final
count. There still is hope.
Bernie,
meanwhile, came out with an unusual statement Monday about Trump, who is
getting into more and more trouble with the Republican Party even as he’s
leading in the Republican primary polls. Most recently he hedged on denouncing
David Duke and the Klan. Mainstream Republicans are numb with impotence. They
don’t know how to handle a front-runner who’s taking the party away from them
and toward a nationalistic fever which is fascist, pure and simple.
We’ve got a big-time capitalist billionaire luring the nationalistic vote with
the promise to make America great
again. He lost it Monday, in my opinion, when he choked in rage at some Black
Lives Matter protesters who interrupted him at a town hall meeting. It was a
disturbing scene, focused on Trump, all but red-faced as he ordered his
bouncers to throw the protesters out of the hall, which they did.
So it’s
getting ugly among Republicans. But on the Democratic side, on Monday we had Bernie rejecting Trump utterly, saying Hate can never replace Love in the United
States of America , or
something close to that. It was, as my wife Jala said, an unusual statement
from a politician of any party, and another reason why I remain stalwart in my
support for Bernie, though I certainly will vote for Hillary in the general election, if it comes to
that.
The thing
is, I worry that Hillary won’t be able to defeat Trump because Trump will
galvanize all those who have never liked her. Are they numerous enough to
offset the anti-Trump vote? I don’t know. No one knows. Everyone counts
differently to their own advantage. I want to believe Bernie can win. I’ll
settle for Hillary but have lower expectations, particularly in matters of war and peace
and, I suppose, social wellness, which includes climate, health care for all,
reining in polluters, taxing Wall Street transactions, expanding free, public
education, etc.
But who
knows? Maybe she’d be a great President, maybe it’s her destiny. But that makes
me feel bad for Bernie because I think he’s got the better platform—one that
I’d like to see implemented. I’d like to see more opportunities open up and
people get more relaxed about life, knowing that there’s a brighter future
ahead for all of us, not just the few who beat their way to the top or are born
into it.
We live
in times that have ceased to be just interesting. Increasingly they are
terrible. Now one of America ’s two
major political parties is on track to nominate an imperial fascist dictator
for President of the USA . The
fear on one side is that he’ll destroy the Republican Party, but if they
nominate him aren’t they the Republican Party?
There’s also talk of someone jumping in.
Bloomberg was mentioned but lately Mitt Romney’s emerged from the old guard,
putting himself forward with anti-Trump tweets. Meanwhile, Rubio is pushing
hard to be the Reagan Republican alternative to Trump, while Cruz keeps a toe
hold of his own on ambition with his appeal to the Christian fundamentalists.
Kasich hangs on as the reasonable traditional small-town Republican Rotarian who just wants people to calm
down and listen to his voice of reason, which is pretty damn narrow once you
get past the soothing tones and listen to what he’s saying. (Still, as governor
of Ohio he took
Medicaid expansion. He may be the best of the sorry lot.)
The real
issue is Bernie, who has the only pure vision of America left
among Presidential candidates in this fateful Leap Year 2016. As we undergo
change so rapid and multi-layered no one can keep track of it, why not aim high
rather than low or fair-to-middlin’? It’s a question that’s been asked before,
and usually—most of the time, in my experience—it’s answered on the safe side.
But sometimes not. Sometimes there is a revolution, or, to put it more
congenially, a spontaneous evolution.
We need
that. In my opinion, it should have happened fifty years ago. But now, we need
it right quick.
2 Comments:
Did you happen to see the lead story in the NYT on Sunday, re: Hillary and Libya? As Sydney Blumenthal said: " You are vindicated!". Indeed.
Missed that story. Bet it's rich.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home