Director's Notes
Top Dog/Underdog
It’s
been twenty years since I’ve had anything to do with the management of a
theater, and I haven’t missed it. But there’s a very cool place in Norfolk called The Venue on 35th. That’s West 35th Street , which divides the less prosperous Park Place neighborhood from the more prosperous Colonial Place section, where our mayor grew up.
The
Venue on 35th hosts a variety of acts on its small stage as it continues to
explore its own potential after seven years on the block. Many local artists
have passed through on their way to wider fame. Many others—like me—keep going
back because it’s an open stage available to us for our performance projects,
especially every Monday night at Open Mic where poets and players can practice
what they’re working on before an audience that is always friendly.
In
fact, for The Venue’s founders—Norfolk native Patti Wray and her partner Lucy
White—Open Mic is the pure embodiment of their intention—to provide a stage and
assemble an audience for local writers and performers to showcase their art.
So
when I realized that Lucy had become ill and Patti was doing most of the work
to keep the place running, I said I could be available to help take up the
slack. They took me up on it and offered me a position as production manager.
There’s
been no time yet for figuring out exactly what that title means because a
scheduled production of a difficult play, Top
Dog/Underdog by Suzan-Lori Parks, was floundering after the unexpected loss
of its director. Thus the finger of fate pointed to me. I waded into the murky
depths of the script to join the two actors who had begun rehearsing but were
not nearly off-book. That was three weeks out from opening night. The play is
long, emotionally complex, and prop-heavy with several costume changes. Could
we make it or should we cancel?
My
co-director, Marlon Hargrave, is one of the actors. He had a passion to do this
play. His co-star is Beatty Barnes, who had done his role before in a Norfolk production seven or eight years ago. Each
of them has an unusually strong, though contrasting, stage presence, which
happens also to perfectly suit the character each plays.
Damn!
I thought. This is too good to pass up! Not that Top Dog/Underdog is a play I’ve been burning to do. I saw the
production Beatty was in, and I remember not liking where it took me by the
end. But this was an emergency. It was happening, just as I came officially on
board at The Venue. I could hardly back away from it.
So
I decided that if these guys were willing to commit to doing the work it would
take to put up this play nearly from scratch in just three weeks, I’d do the
same.
We
successfully opened the show on Feb. 1. Now, after a concentrated rehearsal
period and a weekend of performances behind us, I don’t know if I like where
the play ends or not. It’s no longer about that for me. It’s about watching
these two actors play their roles. For me, they save the play. I haven’t gotten
tired of watching them yet.
Top Dog/Underdog defies labeling, but I’d
call it a tragi-comic drama. At the opening it seems absurdist, even a touch
surreal, with many chuckles at the characters’ expense. But by the end it’s an
all-too-human tragedy. Marlon and Beatty make that stretch work. Even though
the script is over-written, sprinkled with ambiguous symbols, and calls for
minor miracles of staging, they make it work—with considerable support from the
costumes and props collected or hand-created by Missy ShuggaHayes Mohr.
Marlon
is Booth, a black man in his 30s, as the stage directions have it. Beatty is
Lincoln, his older brother. They live together in a cramped boarding house
room—bathroom down the hall—and share a raw, love-hate relationship full of
lies and deceit.
Booth,
who, as original tenant, claims ownership of their shared room, is a flagrant
shop-lifter trying to rekindle his romance with a woman who dumped him because
of his “economic difficulties.” He wants Lincoln to partner with him in the profitable
three-card monté street hustle his brother was once so good at. But Lincoln swore off the cards after one of his
former accomplices was shot to death, probably by a cheated customer. He clings
to his present employment because at least it’s “honest work.”
With
the play shifting thus between the absurd and the all-too-real, it’s hard to
imagine how anything redeeming can emerge from this broken situation. And
nothing really does. Yet for me the play is redeemed by these actors because
they are just so damned good. We might have no pity for Lincoln or Booth if not
for the common humanity Beatty and Marlon capture and portray at nearly every
turn.
Some
critics have made parallels between Lincoln and Booth and pairs of Biblical
brothers—Cain and Abel for fratricide, Jacob and Esau for cheating a brother of
his inheritance. I’m sure the allusions are no accident. The author is surely
well aware of what pleases the literary elite.
But
somehow the actors transcend symbolic comparisons or cultural stereotypes. They
so humanize their characters that they forge a bond between the play, which is
long and disturbing, and the audience, which yearns to find humanity in an
otherwise treacherous situation. People leave the theater, I suspect,
mesmerized more by the performances than by the matter of the play.
If you like good
theater, you really shouldn’t miss this. Top
Dog/Underdog won its Pulitzer back in 2002, but—perhaps unfortunately—is
not outdated yet and plays at The Venue for one more weekend, Feb. 8 and 9 at 8
p.m. and Feb. 10 at 2:30 p.m. Tickets are $15, reservations may be made at 469-0337.